Peer-Reviewers

AJCFL Peer-Review Board

Peer Reviewers

Aksen Journal of Contemporary Family Law

Aksen Journal of Contemporary Family Law (AJCFL) is supported by peer reviewers who contribute their scholarly expertise to maintaining the academic quality, originality, methodological rigor, and research integrity of manuscripts considered for publication. Reviewers provide independent academic assessments in accordance with the journal's peer-review procedures and publication ethics.

AJCFL applies a double-blind peer-review process. Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, confidentially, constructively, and independently, and to disclose any potential conflict of interest that could affect the impartiality of their assessment.

 
Peer Reviewers
Academic Review Board
PEER REVIEWER
Prof. Dr. Bani Syarif Maula, LL.M.
Univeritas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto, Indonesia
PEER REVIEWER
Prof. Dr. Illya Muhsin, M.A.
Univeritas Islam Negeri Salatiga, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
PEER REVIEWER
Prof. Dr. Widodo Winarso, M.A.
Univeritas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati, Cirebon, Indonesia
PEER REVIEWER
Prof. Dr. Wartoyo, M.H.I.
Univeritas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati, Cirebon, Indonesia
PEER REVIEWER
Prof. Dr. Latif Fauzi, M.A.
Univeritas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said, Surakarta, Indonesia
PEER REVIEWER
Prof. Dr. Muflihah Wijayanti, M.S.I.
Univeritas Islam Negeri Metro, Lampung, Indonesia

Role of Peer Reviewers

Peer reviewers play an essential role in supporting the editorial decision-making process and improving the scholarly quality of manuscripts submitted to AJCFL. Reviewers are expected to provide rigorous, evidence-based, constructive, and academically responsible evaluations.

Scholarly Quality
Evaluate originality, contribution, methodology, analysis, and academic significance.
Independence
Provide impartial academic assessment free from inappropriate influence.
Confidentiality
Protect manuscripts and all unpublished information received during review.
Constructive Review
Provide clear, specific, respectful, and actionable recommendations for improvement.
Peer-Review Principles

Reviewers should assess manuscripts solely on their scholarly merit and relevance to AJCFL. Reviewers must maintain confidentiality, disclose conflicts of interest, avoid personal criticism, respect intellectual property, and notify the editors of suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or other potential breaches of research and publication integrity.

Independence Confidentiality Impartiality Academic Rigor Constructive Evaluation Research Integrity
Researcher Profiles: Scopus ID, SINTA ID, and Google Scholar links are displayed, where available, to facilitate verification of reviewers' academic profiles and scholarly publications.
Aksen Journal of Contemporary Family Law (AJCFL)
Double-Blind Peer Review  •  Academic Independence  •  Confidentiality  •  Research Integrity